JewelleNY
Well-Known Member
I guess I am referring to the more kinkier textures of black hair. I notice we tend to think hair looks unbcombed, uncared for, dirty, neglected, if natural hair does not have that shine
But I wonder where did that ideal come from since most 3c, 4 hair types do not shine naturally. I look at pics of Aficans with naturals from decades ago, and even from our 60's black power decade and don't see a lot of shine.
I noticed with Seal and Heidi Klum's children that people think that the youngest boy's, who sports a shiny large fro, hair looks healthy and cute and the oldest, Henry, who sports a kinkier fro, looks a mess and his hair "looks" uncombed (I always wonder how people assume his hair is uncombed )
When I see naturals these days the hair is sooooo moisturized and manipulated that it no longer looks like the true natural hair that is growing out of the scalp. I feel only 3a's and 2's are considered "nice looking" naturals.
Any thoughts?
I will try to post some pics as examples.
But I wonder where did that ideal come from since most 3c, 4 hair types do not shine naturally. I look at pics of Aficans with naturals from decades ago, and even from our 60's black power decade and don't see a lot of shine.
I noticed with Seal and Heidi Klum's children that people think that the youngest boy's, who sports a shiny large fro, hair looks healthy and cute and the oldest, Henry, who sports a kinkier fro, looks a mess and his hair "looks" uncombed (I always wonder how people assume his hair is uncombed )
When I see naturals these days the hair is sooooo moisturized and manipulated that it no longer looks like the true natural hair that is growing out of the scalp. I feel only 3a's and 2's are considered "nice looking" naturals.
Any thoughts?
I will try to post some pics as examples.