asubeauty
Well-Known Member
Just wanted to know if it was just me...
A friend and I were talking one day, and the topic turned to hair. I don't know WHY I talk about it with her... I mentioned conditioner washes and EVOO and she looked at me like I was crazy....
Anyhoo, she told me about her mother's hair. Her mother probably has type 3b/3c hair, and she said her mother has "good hair" and she just wears it short and it's all curly. So I'm like, "What do you mean by 'good hair'?" She says, when hair is curly or wavy, it's "good". Hair that is kinky or "nappy" is "bad" hair.
So I tell her that I don't agree. I think that "good hair" is healthy hair, whether it is straight, wavy, kinky, or curly. I used one of my natural 4a/4b friends as an example. "See, I would say that (natural friend) has good hair. Her fro is always cute and its very healthy."
She replies, "No, her hair is nappy. That's bad hair."
Does anyone think that this method of classifying "good hair" and "bad hair is ingorant"? Furthermore, does anyone else think that there should me no such term as "good hair" and "bad hair"? Maybe "healthy hair" and "unhealthy/damaged hair"????
A friend and I were talking one day, and the topic turned to hair. I don't know WHY I talk about it with her... I mentioned conditioner washes and EVOO and she looked at me like I was crazy....
Anyhoo, she told me about her mother's hair. Her mother probably has type 3b/3c hair, and she said her mother has "good hair" and she just wears it short and it's all curly. So I'm like, "What do you mean by 'good hair'?" She says, when hair is curly or wavy, it's "good". Hair that is kinky or "nappy" is "bad" hair.

So I tell her that I don't agree. I think that "good hair" is healthy hair, whether it is straight, wavy, kinky, or curly. I used one of my natural 4a/4b friends as an example. "See, I would say that (natural friend) has good hair. Her fro is always cute and its very healthy."
She replies, "No, her hair is nappy. That's bad hair."

Does anyone think that this method of classifying "good hair" and "bad hair is ingorant"? Furthermore, does anyone else think that there should me no such term as "good hair" and "bad hair"? Maybe "healthy hair" and "unhealthy/damaged hair"????
I didn't know what he meant by that. I never knew why people would tell me that. I have a perm and his hair is all natural fro and I L-O-V-E his becuase it's well conditoned and oiled (where I helped him in that department). 


When are people going to realize that hair texture has nothing at all to do with the quality of hair being either "good" or "bad." To me, any hair that is on your head, thriving, glowing and healthy, is "good." Period. Thankfully, the good/bad hair thing was never used in my house. I do understand what is meant when others mention it, but I certainly don't agree with it. Since I've unveiled my natural hair texture to the "world" I've been hearing a lot about how "good" my hair is, and people will say that they could never go natural because they don't have that "good" hair. Even during my transition, when I mentioned that I was going to go completely natural, I was asked, "what are you going to do with your hair" as if it is incomprehensible for a sister to not keep her hair straightened. 