JaneBond007
New Member
What exactly is our perspective on the end-times prophesies? If you've never known, you might just be surprised at how it differs. Good chance for us to brush up on what our Church teaches. Let this thread fill up with RCC approved article, discussion and reference for any catholics who happen to wonder by.
_________________________________________________________________
SOURCE
What Catholics Believe About The End of the World
by Kenneth E. Untener
In January of 1843, a preacher named William Miller—the founder of the American Adventist movement—announced that the end of the world would take place between March 21,1843, and March 21,1844. He had combed the Bible for clues and figured it all out.
Thousands from all denominations believed him, and tension mounted as the— yearlong vigil began, heightened by the appearance of a comet. Alas, the fateful year came to an end, and the world didn—t.
Neither did the speculation. There had been a miscalculation, Miller pointed out. He and his followers found a passage in the prophet Habakkuk about a —delay,— and a verse in the Book of Leviticus about 7 days and 10 months. Neither passage, of course, had anything to do with the end of the world, but never mind that. A new date was announced: October 22, 1844. Tension mounted once again. You know the outcome.
Similar scenarios have taken place in every age and continue at this moment. Such prophets never fail to find believers. Elvis lives.
The hype increases as we approach the year 2000. Some take it seriously, even fanatically, as did the Branch Davidian sect in Waco, Texas, in 1993. One radio church lists 24 signs from the Bible that the end is near. Crop rotation in Israel, for example, fulfills a prophecy in Amos about the plowman overtaking the reaper. And on and on it goes.
Some key questions
The problem with all this is that it creates a doomsday mood, and causes people to treat this world like a throwaway ballpoint pen. These past weeks I made it a point to converse with various parishioners about this topic, and I—ll treat here the things that came up most frequently. I do so from a Roman Catholic perspective, based on the work of recognized Scripture scholars and theologians of various denominations. Let—s look first at some commonly asked questions.
What is Armageddon? Thereis a road running through the middle of Israel to the sea. About 15 miles before it reaches the sea lie the ruins of a city called Megiddo. Its strategic location made it the scene of colossal battles going back 6000 years. When speaking of any great conflict, people often spoke of it as Megiddo or Armageddon, Hebrew words referring to the area around this city. Some go to great lengths in speculating about a final battle of Armageddon between the forces of good and evil preceding the end of the world (see Rv 16:14-16).
There is no reason to believe that the city or plain of Armageddon has any connection with the end of the world. It is imply an image, not unlike saying, —Well, next Tuesday is D day.— If someone overheard this and started watching for something to happen next Tuesday on the beaches of Normandy (where the Allies began the invasion of France in World War II), we would think it strange.
What is the significance of the millennium and —The 1000-Year Reign of Christ—? A passage in Revelation reads: “Then I saw an angel come down from heaven, holding in his hand the key to the abyss and a heavy chain. He seized the dragon, —the ancient serpent, which is the Devil or Satan, and tied it up for a thousand years...— (Rv 20:1-2).
The thousand years simply means a long time, just as we might say, —You won't guess this in a thousand years.— We—are now in the long period between Christ—s victory (symbolically expressed by tying up Satan) and his coming in glory. It could last millions of years. There are people (“millenarians—) who take this passage literally and search for signs of some thousand-year period on earth. When you start thinking in terms of a millennium, the approach of the year 2000 can get exciting. The same thing happened as the year 1000 approached. It—s the old problem of taking symbolic language literally.
Should we be preoccupied about the year 2000? We number things for convenience. The pages in a book, for example, are numbered for easy reference. The page numbered 100 really isn—t the 100th page, since the first few pages either aren—t numbered or have Roman numerals. The numbers simply help us find the right page.
We have done the same with our years, and there have been different numbering systems—the Jewish calendar, the Chinese calendar and others. The Gregorian calendar, now in common use, was introduced some 400 years ago, and took the birth of Christ as its reference point.
The year 2000 is not really the 2000th year. For one thing, the Gregorian calendar has no year —zero——which means we are already one year off. For another thing, there was a miscalculation on the date of Christ—s birth, which took place between 7 and 4 B.C. In other words, the year 2000 is not the 2000th year after Christ—s birth. Calendar dates are just numbers for common reference, with no particular scriptural or theological significance.
What about the —rapture—? We normally use rapture to signify spiritual or emotional ecstasy. However, the more basic meaning of the word is —to seize, to transport.— End-of-the-world prophets use it in this latter sense. Matthew—s Gospel speaks of two women grinding meal; one is —taken— and the other is left (see 24:41). Literalists do not accept this as symbolic language, and they expect that at the end of time the just will be plucked from the earth by God (see 1 Thes 4:17). Bumper stickers read, ——Are you ready for the rapture?— It is another example of taking symbolic language literally.
How should we understand the Antichrist? The term Antichrist appears only in the first and second epistles of John. It is clearly a term symbolic of the forces working against Christ in all periods of history, not a clue about a specific individual. If someone observed, —Every family has skeletons in the closet,— you would miss the point if you started searching the hallway closet!
_________________________________________________________________
SOURCE
What Catholics Believe About The End of the World
by Kenneth E. Untener
In January of 1843, a preacher named William Miller—the founder of the American Adventist movement—announced that the end of the world would take place between March 21,1843, and March 21,1844. He had combed the Bible for clues and figured it all out.
Thousands from all denominations believed him, and tension mounted as the— yearlong vigil began, heightened by the appearance of a comet. Alas, the fateful year came to an end, and the world didn—t.
Neither did the speculation. There had been a miscalculation, Miller pointed out. He and his followers found a passage in the prophet Habakkuk about a —delay,— and a verse in the Book of Leviticus about 7 days and 10 months. Neither passage, of course, had anything to do with the end of the world, but never mind that. A new date was announced: October 22, 1844. Tension mounted once again. You know the outcome.
Similar scenarios have taken place in every age and continue at this moment. Such prophets never fail to find believers. Elvis lives.
The hype increases as we approach the year 2000. Some take it seriously, even fanatically, as did the Branch Davidian sect in Waco, Texas, in 1993. One radio church lists 24 signs from the Bible that the end is near. Crop rotation in Israel, for example, fulfills a prophecy in Amos about the plowman overtaking the reaper. And on and on it goes.
Some key questions
The problem with all this is that it creates a doomsday mood, and causes people to treat this world like a throwaway ballpoint pen. These past weeks I made it a point to converse with various parishioners about this topic, and I—ll treat here the things that came up most frequently. I do so from a Roman Catholic perspective, based on the work of recognized Scripture scholars and theologians of various denominations. Let—s look first at some commonly asked questions.
What is Armageddon? Thereis a road running through the middle of Israel to the sea. About 15 miles before it reaches the sea lie the ruins of a city called Megiddo. Its strategic location made it the scene of colossal battles going back 6000 years. When speaking of any great conflict, people often spoke of it as Megiddo or Armageddon, Hebrew words referring to the area around this city. Some go to great lengths in speculating about a final battle of Armageddon between the forces of good and evil preceding the end of the world (see Rv 16:14-16).
There is no reason to believe that the city or plain of Armageddon has any connection with the end of the world. It is imply an image, not unlike saying, —Well, next Tuesday is D day.— If someone overheard this and started watching for something to happen next Tuesday on the beaches of Normandy (where the Allies began the invasion of France in World War II), we would think it strange.
What is the significance of the millennium and —The 1000-Year Reign of Christ—? A passage in Revelation reads: “Then I saw an angel come down from heaven, holding in his hand the key to the abyss and a heavy chain. He seized the dragon, —the ancient serpent, which is the Devil or Satan, and tied it up for a thousand years...— (Rv 20:1-2).
The thousand years simply means a long time, just as we might say, —You won't guess this in a thousand years.— We—are now in the long period between Christ—s victory (symbolically expressed by tying up Satan) and his coming in glory. It could last millions of years. There are people (“millenarians—) who take this passage literally and search for signs of some thousand-year period on earth. When you start thinking in terms of a millennium, the approach of the year 2000 can get exciting. The same thing happened as the year 1000 approached. It—s the old problem of taking symbolic language literally.
Should we be preoccupied about the year 2000? We number things for convenience. The pages in a book, for example, are numbered for easy reference. The page numbered 100 really isn—t the 100th page, since the first few pages either aren—t numbered or have Roman numerals. The numbers simply help us find the right page.
We have done the same with our years, and there have been different numbering systems—the Jewish calendar, the Chinese calendar and others. The Gregorian calendar, now in common use, was introduced some 400 years ago, and took the birth of Christ as its reference point.
The year 2000 is not really the 2000th year. For one thing, the Gregorian calendar has no year —zero——which means we are already one year off. For another thing, there was a miscalculation on the date of Christ—s birth, which took place between 7 and 4 B.C. In other words, the year 2000 is not the 2000th year after Christ—s birth. Calendar dates are just numbers for common reference, with no particular scriptural or theological significance.
What about the —rapture—? We normally use rapture to signify spiritual or emotional ecstasy. However, the more basic meaning of the word is —to seize, to transport.— End-of-the-world prophets use it in this latter sense. Matthew—s Gospel speaks of two women grinding meal; one is —taken— and the other is left (see 24:41). Literalists do not accept this as symbolic language, and they expect that at the end of time the just will be plucked from the earth by God (see 1 Thes 4:17). Bumper stickers read, ——Are you ready for the rapture?— It is another example of taking symbolic language literally.
How should we understand the Antichrist? The term Antichrist appears only in the first and second epistles of John. It is clearly a term symbolic of the forces working against Christ in all periods of history, not a clue about a specific individual. If someone observed, —Every family has skeletons in the closet,— you would miss the point if you started searching the hallway closet!
Last edited: