kurlybella
Well-Known Member
very CLEAN topic mods.
i've been following the jesse jame's and sandra scandal and i feel so bad for her.
but i couldn't help but notice that the two women, so far , that have come out mentioned "wild" or "crazy" sex, etc.
now it does not take a rocket scientist to get that this means "extra."
so i want to know what you ladies think.
if your husband asks you to do something you are not comfortable with, does that really justify cheating?
does it ever justify (cheating aside, say you never cheated) breaking up with a person of marriage potential because they are not comfortable doing your "wild things" but are "perfect" in every other sense?
i feel so bad for sandra and OF COURSE we don't know the reason for the cheating, i'm just spinning off of what i've read so far, but i would not be surprised if that was (part of) the case.
i often hear men say, esp. in relation to the tiger scandal, "maybe she [ellen] was not giving it to him right!"
erplexed
i even have heard women and men say that you should/must do x for your man because if you don't then he will feel like you don't accept all of him...or whatever other apologetic reason there is to give.
IF YOU DON'T LIKE SOMETHING OR ARE NOT COMFORTABLE WITH SOMETHING after a respectful discussion, then your partner should be ALL accepting, no?
even bill clintion mention that he had not had that act done to him in a long time (according to monica).
if we are supposed to accept our spouse if they, say go from fit to fat, then why does it seem that we don't do this for sex?
isn't marriage for better or for worse - sex and all?
i'll share my thoughts in a bit.
i've been following the jesse jame's and sandra scandal and i feel so bad for her.
but i couldn't help but notice that the two women, so far , that have come out mentioned "wild" or "crazy" sex, etc.
now it does not take a rocket scientist to get that this means "extra."
so i want to know what you ladies think.
if your husband asks you to do something you are not comfortable with, does that really justify cheating?
does it ever justify (cheating aside, say you never cheated) breaking up with a person of marriage potential because they are not comfortable doing your "wild things" but are "perfect" in every other sense?
i feel so bad for sandra and OF COURSE we don't know the reason for the cheating, i'm just spinning off of what i've read so far, but i would not be surprised if that was (part of) the case.
i often hear men say, esp. in relation to the tiger scandal, "maybe she [ellen] was not giving it to him right!"
erplexed
i even have heard women and men say that you should/must do x for your man because if you don't then he will feel like you don't accept all of him...or whatever other apologetic reason there is to give.
IF YOU DON'T LIKE SOMETHING OR ARE NOT COMFORTABLE WITH SOMETHING after a respectful discussion, then your partner should be ALL accepting, no?
even bill clintion mention that he had not had that act done to him in a long time (according to monica).
if we are supposed to accept our spouse if they, say go from fit to fat, then why does it seem that we don't do this for sex?
isn't marriage for better or for worse - sex and all?
i'll share my thoughts in a bit.