renee_n_3000
Active Member
Does anyone have an opinion on this product? I put "original" in quotes because even though it says that on the bottle, it can't truly be original. I used it many years ago and it smelled bad, but it smells much better now. Dare I say it actually smells nice? So, at the very least, they must have changed the fragrance. I bought the liquid version, though I saw they have a cream now, too.
I was in love with Suave's leave-in conditioner and stocked up on it when it became discontinued, but I ran out of it a few weeks ago. So, when I was in the store a few days ago, I picked up 911 on a whim. I used it yesterday, and am very pleased with the results. I might like it even better than my beloved Suave leave-in! It seems like my hair has an extra sparkle on top of its regular shine, and it's smoother and silkier than it has been the past two weeks when I was going without a leave-in conditioner.
But, I just did a search here (with no restrictions as to dates), and came up with a grand total of 4 mentions of this product on this board, one of which was unfavorable. So, I'm thinking this stuff can't possibly be as great as it seems if it's never been popular on the LHCF.
What do you think?
I was in love with Suave's leave-in conditioner and stocked up on it when it became discontinued, but I ran out of it a few weeks ago. So, when I was in the store a few days ago, I picked up 911 on a whim. I used it yesterday, and am very pleased with the results. I might like it even better than my beloved Suave leave-in! It seems like my hair has an extra sparkle on top of its regular shine, and it's smoother and silkier than it has been the past two weeks when I was going without a leave-in conditioner.
But, I just did a search here (with no restrictions as to dates), and came up with a grand total of 4 mentions of this product on this board, one of which was unfavorable. So, I'm thinking this stuff can't possibly be as great as it seems if it's never been popular on the LHCF.
What do you think?
Last edited: