Girl please get outta my head!!!!Now let's translate this to hair. The basic formula is moisture/protein balance, protection (ends protected/heat protected), good health, and consistency. Why are we trying to fit a bunch of other things into the formula that are just extra? Why are we in search of the magic product or method? Isn't the basics good enough to get us to the end goal? When people report something new, overall, I think it's great that they are thinking outside of the box, but when things (IMO) are just waaaay left field, and when I read how people are jumping on bandwagons because Susie got 1.5" in 1 month using xyz product, to me that's total BS and overhyped [in SweetPea's world]. I keep thinking about Public Enemy's song "Don't believe the hype"
I understand that some of you ladies need a broken down wikipedia definition on BS and overhyped, but just take it at face value. On the other hand, some of you clearly get what I'm trying to say and I'm glad to see that this thread is still alive and kickin
Oh, and who am I (or any of you) to call something BS just because it didn't work for us?? Well, we're critical thinkers who know what's up with the hair game . But as always, if something is working for you, rock on!!

I've seen some strange things but for me the one that took the cake was using Monistat for growth. I mean, it's a cream for vaginal yeast infection, y'all. It has no business being on our heads. For me that was just total BS.
