If you'd asked me 6 months ago I would've voted no.
But recent developements have changed my POV. So now my stance is this...
As with MANY things when considering marriage, it all depends. The person with bad credit, who knows nothing about credit and continues to create more bad credit and (most importantly!) is unwilling to dig in to fix said bad credit is a NO in terms of marriage potential.
But the person with bad credit who is otherwise good with money, knows/understands their situation and the credit "game" and is determined to do whatever it takes to fix it? Let's go!
I have this new POV because someone close to me recently hit the credit skids. She's had a 700 score for most of her adult life. THen got involved in a "can't lose" lawsuit... but lost and now is dealing with the resulting fallout. One part being a HUGE hit on her credit. Knowing her character and her mindset towards her finances I couldn't dismiss her as marriage potential because of this. She is going to dig herself out from under. For her - there is no other option.
So again... it just depends!
It depends on why the credit was bad to begin with. I think that holding a credit score/report over a person's head isn't really a fair reason NOT to marry a person. If the person was a deadbeat, didn't work, didn't manage their money, were flat out irresponsible....you shouldn't be dating or considering marriage with them anyway. I think it shouldn't just be a flat out NO though.
Outside of that, I'm not saying to settle, I'm just saying that its one more way to exclude the person of your dreams perhaps. I definitely think you should hold your standards and high and get the person you want in life but the more selection criteria you put on a person, well the less you get to select from.