Ladybelle
New Member
http://sisterlocksvnappylocscourtcasenappylocswon.com/
http://sisterlocksvnappylocscourtcasenappylocswon.com/files/courtvictory2.pdf (direct link to the court papers)
http://sisterlocksvnappylocscourtcasenappylocswon.com/files/trainer_s_man.pdf (sisterlocs training manual & Declaration made by the "founder" of sisterlocs, Joann Cornwell
Did ya'll know about this?? Apparently the supposed founder of sisterlocks sued the lady of nappylocs for copyright infringement. If you read the court papers, nappylocs won on the grounds that sisterlocks is not patented,trademarked or copyrighted. Also the technique of "micro dreadlocks" is not new and it's origins go waaaay back.
Basically what it all boils down to- the sisterlock method is nothing new and no one should feel they have to pay this to get micro locs. The technique claimed to have been invented by the founder of sisterlocks was not in fact invented by her. The nappylocs founder provides the same instruction on how to do "sisterlocs" for a much cheaper price.
I ran across this in doing my research for sisterlocks and was surprised to stumble upon this. From what I can gather, nappylocs produces the same results as sisterlocks but only much cheaper. Is this true?
What do you know about this??? Any thoughts, opinions??
ETA: in doing further research, the nappylocs vs sisterlock- nappylocs appears to be the same technique, just waaayy cheaper. Nappylocs also gives you the option to make locs of anysize: small,medium, large etc. Here's the link to both websites. You be the judge.
http://www.nappynhappy.com/ & http://www.nappylocs.com (nappylocks)
http://www.sisterlocks.com/ (sisterlocks)
http://sisterlocksvnappylocscourtcasenappylocswon.com/files/courtvictory2.pdf (direct link to the court papers)
http://sisterlocksvnappylocscourtcasenappylocswon.com/files/trainer_s_man.pdf (sisterlocs training manual & Declaration made by the "founder" of sisterlocs, Joann Cornwell
Did ya'll know about this?? Apparently the supposed founder of sisterlocks sued the lady of nappylocs for copyright infringement. If you read the court papers, nappylocs won on the grounds that sisterlocks is not patented,trademarked or copyrighted. Also the technique of "micro dreadlocks" is not new and it's origins go waaaay back.
Basically what it all boils down to- the sisterlock method is nothing new and no one should feel they have to pay this to get micro locs. The technique claimed to have been invented by the founder of sisterlocks was not in fact invented by her. The nappylocs founder provides the same instruction on how to do "sisterlocs" for a much cheaper price.
I ran across this in doing my research for sisterlocks and was surprised to stumble upon this. From what I can gather, nappylocs produces the same results as sisterlocks but only much cheaper. Is this true?
What do you know about this??? Any thoughts, opinions??
ETA: in doing further research, the nappylocs vs sisterlock- nappylocs appears to be the same technique, just waaayy cheaper. Nappylocs also gives you the option to make locs of anysize: small,medium, large etc. Here's the link to both websites. You be the judge.
http://www.nappynhappy.com/ & http://www.nappylocs.com (nappylocks)
http://www.sisterlocks.com/ (sisterlocks)
Last edited: