Relaxers sales are on the decline Thanks to Naomi Campbell... LONG POST

MsLizziA

Well-Known Member
The image quickly made rounds in magazines and the blogosphere – Supermodel Naomi Campbell captured on film just as a gust of wind swept back her hair revealing a massive bald patch at her left temple.

Everyone wanted to know: what happened to Naomi Campbell's hair?
The consensus was traction alopecia, a condition that develops when fragile hair strands are stressed due to tension, which in Campbell's case appeared to be from hair extensions.

As Atlanta gears up for the mid-summer Bronner Brothers hair show, which takes place August 7-10, black hair is once again in the spotlight, highlighting a growing cadre of women, who in an effort to avoid a Naomi Campbell-type disaster, have increasingly turned to less stressful hair styles.


Such trends are altering the $165 million mass market black haircare industry, and not always for the better. The two largest black haircare companies, L'Oreal USA and Alberto Culver Company, which account for more than one-third of the market, have both experienced sales declines in recent years, according to a 2009 study from Mintel, an international market research firm.


And while relaxers have been at the heart of the black haircare industry, 2007 saw the beginning of a decline in sales of relaxer kits at mass market stores, which is projected to continue during the next four years.
But Jerry Dingle, vice president of professional sales and marketing at Atlanta-based Bronner Brothers, said relaxers -- at least on the salon level -- are still very much mainstay of the black haircare industry.

"I don't agree with the trend away from relaxers," he said.

Natural hair is more about a look than a rebellion against chemical products, he said, adding that the trend has attracted converts because it is more economical and requires less maintenance than chemically altered hair. :huh:


Bronner Brothers offers some products geared toward natural hair such as its African Royale line, but most of the company's maintenance products can be used on a variety of hair types, he said. Dingle said they've adopted a wait-and-see approach when it comes to new product introductions, since this isn't the first time the hair pendulum has swung from natural looks to chemically straightened hair and back again.
When stylist Tracy Robertson came to Atlanta 13 years ago, almost everyone was chemically relaxing their hair. Today, TAG Salon, of which Robertson is part-owner, is among a number of local businesses offering natural products and services solely for natural hair.

"So many women in Atlanta have begun to embrace natural hair. Atlanta is the hub [for black haircare trends] being the hair city that it is," Robertson said.

In February 2009, Robertson and three stylists joined forces to open the salon on Pharr Road offering care and maintenance services for natural hair.

"When you say natural hair, people are thinking Afro and Angela Davis. They are not thinking about what we do," said Robertson, explaining the TAG process of styling hair straight without the help of chemicals.
Though chemical relaxers are still widely used, little objective data has been published on the effects. A recent study in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, linked relaxers to hair damage. The study, conducted by Dr. Nonhlanhla P. Khumalo at Groote Schuur Hospital in Cape Town, found that cystine, an amino acid considered a measure for hair fragility, was reduced in relaxed hair of the study subjects. Add styling stress, and the scene is set for a Campbell-type disaster.

At TAG, Robertson said they seek to offer clients similar style results as relaxers minus the damage. It was a gamble in a city where most salons continue to offer some form of chemical straightening. The four owners struggled for a few months, working without pay, until the salon began attracting 60 percent new clients via word of mouth. They followed with a proprietary line of sulfate and methylparaben free shampoos and conditioners and are now preparing to open salon franchises in Washington, D.C. and Dallas.

Cindy Primm, owner of Sage Naturalceuticals in Castleberry Hill, has also seen a shift in the number of Atlantans wearing more natural and textured hair styles. Early this year, she decided to revamp her inventory to meet the growing demand. Primm, who only stocks natural products, hunted down haircare companies such as the locally produced Darcy's Botanicals and Texas-based AfroVeda.

The adjustment quickly paid off.

"It created traffic where there really was no traffic for people seeking me out," Primm said. "We get a mix of people who have natural hair and wear it straight, but for the most part at least 75 percent of our customers coming in looking for natural products actually wear their hair in its natural state."
She currently carries seven lines of natural products for kinky, curly or Afro-textured hair, none of which are manufactured by the major haircare companies.

"For the bigger companies out there, the trend of naturals and getting rid of chemicals is more of a recent thing," Primm said. "Because other people recognize that there is a hole in the market, the smaller companies started creating products to meet their own needs."

http://www.accessatlanta.com/Access...dulum-shifting-577387.html?cxntlid=daylf_tpcr
 
BTW i know how it gets on this board with the whole natural vs perms thing and this is not meant to be that type of post... so please don't be offended
 
Natural hair is more about a look than a rebellion against chemical products, he said, adding that the trend has attracted converts because it is more economical and requires less maintenance than chemically altered hair.

I believe that more women of color are going natural now because they are aware that they have more options. I don't think anybody is thinking about Naomi Campbell.

Maybe I'm naive, but isn't Naomi bald because of weaves? I don't think she has enough hair for a relaxer.
 
I believe that more women of color are going natural now because they are aware that they have more options. I don't think anybody is thinking about Naomi Campbell.

Maybe I'm naive, but isn't Naomi bald because of weaves? I don't think she has enough hair for a relaxer.

Yeah, this is what I assumed as well.
 
^^ I was wondering what Naomi's hair had to do with relaxers :confused: her hair is a whole nother thing
I believe that more women of color are going natural now because they are aware that they have more options. I don't think anybody is thinking about Naomi Campbell.

Maybe I'm naive, but isn't Naomi bald because of weaves? I don't think she has enough hair for a relaxer.

The same thing i was wondering.... but they said it.. not me
 
According to the article this person received a "silking" treatment (their words not mine) which means she's texlaxed. Nothing against texlaxing, but they couldn't provide a different example? Miss Jessie must've paid for this article LOL j/k

hair_0726-ba02_639720l.jpg
 
According to the article this person received a "silking" treatment (their words not mine) which means she's texlaxed. Nothing against texlaxing, but they couldn't provide a different example? Miss Jessie must've paid for this article LOL j/k

hair_0726-ba02_639720l.jpg
They might have :D.... but i must have missed that part. They tried to pass the texlax off as natural?
 
Actually "silking" could refer to a silky press. Using a flat iron to create silky flowy straight hair on natural hair. Its popular in ATL and that's where the article is written.
 
Lol, well I guess this is an example of how mis-information gets passed around with companies controlling the information as a means to make money. No offense to the OP, thanks for bringing this to light.

I just find it kind of hilarious that it was never actually stated or proved what was contributing to NAOMI's problem, but someone said it was relaxers and thus started working on systems to make money (something even they admit) because they saw a decline long before this.

I mean seriously...is there anyone but newborn babies on this planet that thinks Naomi's hair is real? The woman wears wigs and weaves 24/7, part of that is understandable because of her work as a model and the other half is (just my opinion) downright disinterest in dealing with her own hair at all. Lacefronts and wigs (the upcoming big money makers in the industry) are what's f>cked up her hair, lol.

But shhhh, don't let anyone know till they make thei 3 million.
 
I thought her hairline was ripped out because of either too tight braiding or long term adhesive use. This is something that can happen to wig and weave wearers regardless of texture - i.e. it can be natural or relaxed.
 
...

Everyone wanted to know: what happened to Naomi Campbell's hair?
The consensus was traction alopecia, a condition that develops when fragile hair strands are stressed due to tension, which in Campbell's case appeared to be from hair extensions. ...

http://www.accessatlanta.com/Access...dulum-shifting-577387.html?cxntlid=daylf_tpcr

So we know having relaxers and weaves are not all bad it is how it processed and maintained. The article does contribute Naomi’s bad hairlines to hair extension but sadly drops the ball to attack chemically relaxed hair instead off addressing the issue of too tight weaves and braids.

Clearly the perspective of the author was to provide an alternative to relax haircare and a growing natural industry but should have also included weave/extension since Naomi was brought up in the article. Natural and relax women do weaves/braid their hair and the danger of weaves (LF, extensions, etc)/braids should also be addressed. Maybe Naomi will become a spoke person against improper weaving and turn to alternative hairstyling. I would want my hair back if I was her. Model bald for a while I am sure the world would love her just the same.

I wonder why the author drops the ball on the weaving and braiding, is it that the weave industries are protected or something and a lawsuit would be pinned against the author? It would be interesting to know if the extension and weave industries have faltered a bit. Now that would be news! Maybe this will give AA a chance to jump onto this growing industries and take back a piece of the pie in the market place!
 
There was another article someone had posted about relaxer sales declining a while back. The Naomi angle was pointless, trying to grab attention was what that was.
 
Lol, well I guess this is an example of how mis-information gets passed around with companies controlling the information as a means to make money. No offense to the OP, thanks for bringing this to light.

I just find it kind of hilarious that it was never actually stated or proved what was contributing to NAOMI's problem, but someone said it was relaxers and thus started working on systems to make money (something even they admit) because they saw a decline long before this.

I mean seriously...is there anyone but newborn babies on this planet that thinks Naomi's hair is real? The woman wears wigs and weaves 24/7, part of that is understandable because of her work as a model and the other half is (just my opinion) downright disinterest in dealing with her own hair at all. Lacefronts and wigs (the upcoming big money makers in the industry) are what's f>cked up her hair, lol.

But shhhh, don't let anyone know till they make thei 3 million.

In their defense the OP presented a misleading title to her thread. They named their piece Black hair care pendulum is shifting. Nowhere did they say relaxer sales had declined because of Naomi's hair and they do state that her issue is most likely traction alopecia.
 
In their defense the OP presented a misleading title to her thread. They named their piece Black hair care pendulum is shifting. Nowhere did they say relaxer sales had declined because of Naomi's hair and they do state that her issue is most likely traction alopecia.
Well i honestly don't see where mentioning her hair in this article was even relevant. The way its written is misleading
 
"When you say natural hair, people are thinking Afro and Angela Davis. They are not thinking about what we do," said Robertson, explaining the TAG process of styling hair straight without the help of chemicals.

http://www.accessatlanta.com/Access...dulum-shifting-577387.html?cxntlid=daylf_tpcr

I found this part disturbing. Maybe it's because I wear a fro but why is the fro always portrayed as an undesirable style. This is what my hair naturally does, what is so wrong w/that? Why is the goal still to get the hair straight? Granted I am glad that there is a shift away from chemicals in general. I am not anti-straight hair.
 
I found this part disturbing. Maybe it's because I wear a fro but why is the fro always portrayed as an undesirable style. This is what my hair naturally does, what is so wrong w/that? Why is the goal still to get the hair straight? Granted I am glad that there is a shift away from chemicals in general. I am not anti-straight hair.
alot of the comments n this article r ignorant

"natural hair is a rebellion" :huh: O_o
 
Shouldn't there be a direct correlation to a decline in WEAVE sales... or are women just too blind to see that. Humph!
 
alot of the comments n this article r ignorant

"natural hair is a rebellion" :huh: O_o

Weren't we born with Natural hair?? So, exectly who are we rebelling against...someone who wants us to be unnatural, unlike oursleves, mor like them for their own comfort. Humph, how selfish can they be? BS! Mark Anthony got down with Cleopatra in all her African glory and came back for more. And I ain't talking about Elizabeth Taylor either!
 
Y'all naturals know y'all like making these anti-relaxer threads. It's like some of y'all SECRETELY want one.:look:

hmmmm.....:lachen::lachen::lachen:
 
I found this part disturbing. Maybe it's because I wear a fro but why is the fro always portrayed as an undesirable style. This is what my hair naturally does, what is so wrong w/that? Why is the goal still to get the hair straight? Granted I am glad that there is a shift away from chemicals in general. I am not anti-straight hair.

'cause folks' is brainwashed :yep:
 
Nothing is rebellious about natural hair....:huh: Oh well, I have been rebelling for 12 years and counting.

I think relaxer sales are on the decline due to the facts about the damage that it may do to MOST heads - if they are not properly taken care of.....And we all know that only a small number of folks really have tools like LHCF......
 
Those "natural" pics were of straightened hair ... I mean, it's still natural but that's not the look that comes to mind. It seemed - to me - that it's ok not to wear relaxers, but just make sure it's still straight. :rolleyes:
 
Nothing is rebellious about natural hair....:huh: Oh well, I have been rebelling for 12 years and counting.

I think relaxer sales are on the decline due to the facts about the damage that it may do to MOST heads - if they are not properly taken care of.....And we all know that only a small number of folks really have tools like LHCF......
i was justt about to say this
 
Y'all naturals know y'all like making these anti-relaxer threads. It's like some of y'all SECRETELY want one.:look:

hmmmm.....:lachen::lachen::lachen:

Are you for real? This is hardly an anti-relaxer thread. It's more a discussion about the article and the article's jankyness. Instead of being cute your little swipe at naturals spoke volumes about your own insecurities.
 
Back
Top