</font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
Cami said:
Armyqt, what is the difference between no-lye and lye relaxers? I just seen your pics and your hair is beautiful also. I seen that you said that no-lyes have damaged your hair. I thought that those were less harsh than the lye? /images/graemlins/confused.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
Thanks for the compliments Cami. I always thought no-lye was better for my hair, before I discovered hairboards. Actually the no-lye is better for your scalp and the lye is better for the hair shaft. No-lye contains a chemical called sodium hydroxide that leaves calcium deposits on the hair shaft, which eventually dries tha hair out. Here is an excerpt I saved from somewhere. I just can't remember where at the moment:
<font color="blue"> Calcium hydroxide (the straightening ingredient in no-lye relaxers) has a pH that is as high as or higher than sodium hydroxide (lye) relaxers. But they don’t straighten and smooth the hair as well as lye. This may not be a problem if you have a loose curl pattern. But kinkier hair strands will be dried up from the inside to the outside. Anyone with a natural curl pattern that is tighter than Gloria Reuben's should stay away from ammonium, calcium hydroxide and thioglocylate (sp?) based hair straighteners. Maybe not immediately, but eventually your hair will end up under-processed, dry, dull and hard. Then it will start to break. </font>
Hope this helps /images/graemlins/frown.gif