Jaelin
Active Member
Is it possible that the chemicals from a relaxer caused so much damage that it was/is affecting me so many years later? erplexed
Quoting from my journal:
Surge "Flakes: I am experiencing this but it's not the regular dandruff flakes that I've had in the past. It's skin. Dried skin. It's only in two spots now: the right temple and the back of my head (nape??). It's very noticeable at the right temple. Before washing on Sun. I spent a good while trying to lift the skin off my scalp and then brush it out. The first time I noticed flakes, the left temple also had them but they did not re-occur after I washed my hair that week.
I think it's significant that those spots at the temple were tender when I first used surge and they're the ones that were burned in the past by relaxers. I knew that they had sustained damage because my hair was always thinner in those two spots after, and didn't change that much when I switched to natural/texturized, but the improvement that I'm getting from surge (at the right temple especially) is making me wonder if I should have gone to a dermatologist back then. Of course I didn't know anything about hair back then. Now the nape situation baffles me. I can't remember a specific incident of burning, but then again my scalp was always sensitive, there was always a spot that started to feel like it was burning when I went to the salon for a touch-up. The temple stands out to me because when it happened it was way more painful than normal. For something that I did for almost five/six years, I can't believe that I'm still dealing with the after effects on my scalp almost a decade after stopping (if it's the reason why)."
My hair has only started to grow (or maybe I should say, retained lenght for me to notice) at the back of my head since last august. The two spots at the temple had filled in some with temple balm, but the difference from four weeks of using surge is just wonderful. I tried to document but I don't think my photos really show the difference.
Quoting from my journal:
Surge "Flakes: I am experiencing this but it's not the regular dandruff flakes that I've had in the past. It's skin. Dried skin. It's only in two spots now: the right temple and the back of my head (nape??). It's very noticeable at the right temple. Before washing on Sun. I spent a good while trying to lift the skin off my scalp and then brush it out. The first time I noticed flakes, the left temple also had them but they did not re-occur after I washed my hair that week.
I think it's significant that those spots at the temple were tender when I first used surge and they're the ones that were burned in the past by relaxers. I knew that they had sustained damage because my hair was always thinner in those two spots after, and didn't change that much when I switched to natural/texturized, but the improvement that I'm getting from surge (at the right temple especially) is making me wonder if I should have gone to a dermatologist back then. Of course I didn't know anything about hair back then. Now the nape situation baffles me. I can't remember a specific incident of burning, but then again my scalp was always sensitive, there was always a spot that started to feel like it was burning when I went to the salon for a touch-up. The temple stands out to me because when it happened it was way more painful than normal. For something that I did for almost five/six years, I can't believe that I'm still dealing with the after effects on my scalp almost a decade after stopping (if it's the reason why)."
My hair has only started to grow (or maybe I should say, retained lenght for me to notice) at the back of my head since last august. The two spots at the temple had filled in some with temple balm, but the difference from four weeks of using surge is just wonderful. I tried to document but I don't think my photos really show the difference.