CocoGlow
Well-Known Member
I liked this. I actually posted on FB and posted on my Natural Hair group. I hope people watch this.
Me too SIS ... it really is a great film!
I liked this. I actually posted on FB and posted on my Natural Hair group. I hope people watch this.
Interesting, but as soon as the narrator said "oriental woman" my face was like this erplexed
How are you going to do a doccumentary about race relations and call an asian person "oriental".... seriously?
Most Caribbean/African men I've encountered love the straight long hair and the "good hair". They are not really a fan of weaves, but natural hair is DEFINITELY not a preference.Canadian film? I knew it....those accents are a give away. Thanks for sharing.
9 times out of 10 they are asking Caribbean/African men. Most Caribbean/African men PREFER NATURAL HAIR in Canada. This film is good, but I would like to see what black american men had to say.
Every Asian I know is highly offended by "Oriental". One of my friends asked someone if he is a "rug", when they called him that.I know in Toronto Asians refer to themselves as Oriental and this is a Canadian film.
I'm Canadian and most Caribbean/African men love the straight long hair and the "good hair". They are not really a fan of weaves, but natural hair is DEFINITELY not a preference.
Canadian film? I knew it....those accents are a give away. Thanks for sharing.
9 times out of 10 they are asking Caribbean/African men. Most Caribbean/African men PREFER NATURAL HAIR in Canada. This film is good, but I would like to see what black american men had to say.
I did notice the Canadian thing...I wonder if the Caribbean/African men there really prefer natural hair or is it just the men they interviewed....it did sound like a group of natural hair loving friends who may think differently than the majority...it's kind of hard to get a general idea about what any group thinks even if they interviewed Black men in this country, but that is interesting...
NappyRina, your hair is cute in your avi.
i think most women (any race) should take a step back and distance their emotions and who they are from how and what they do to their hair.
I thought it was common knowledge oriental is a no-no.
Anyway, the documentary was OK. I liked some parts of it, but it was definitely more geared toward the whole evil relaxer/processed hair idea than it was fair-minded. Also, I noticed the dig about light-skinned women. I'm sorry, it was an OK documentary, but it was definitely and clearly biased, and not even subtly to me. Just very much so. Not my kind of documentaries. Yeah, yeah, yeah, Beyonce is light skinned and wears her hair straight 90% of the time. OH NO. HOW DARE SHE. Give me a break.
Don't get me wrong, there were some good parts where I definitely was interested and felt they were touching on GOOD points, but it did come off preachy and biased sometimes (like with above).
@andromeda Thanks for your insights.I think Professor Walcott's (he sounds like he's bajan) interview snippets are worth the proverbial price of admission. His statement about the contradiction and need to negotiate freedom of expression (black people have a particular penchant for adornment and expression) with racial aesthetic integrity/self-acceptance hits on a significant reason why some people are taken aback by the "why you wear your hair straight" discussion.
The filmmaker looked ravishing with her baldie; she has really nice features.
I found the mens' comments about weave interesting.
I also think the historical insight about the dynamic that resulted from slave women being made to cut their hair off, while the mistress of the plantation got to have long, well-groomed hair hits on the point I made in the other thread about slaves being deprived of their traditional styling tools, products and techniques.
It's so great that regular people/amateur filmmakers who are passionate about something can produce their own documentaries for a reasonable price, and more importantly, distribute it across the world by uploading it to YouTube. As Chris Rock's documentary, high production values/budget/nationwide theater release have little correlation with earnestness, integrity and positive impact.
Thanks for sharing, nappyrina!
I thought it was common knowledge oriental is a no-no.
Anyway, the documentary was OK. I liked some parts of it, but it was definitely more geared toward the whole evil relaxer/processed hair idea than it was fair-minded. Also, I noticed the dig about light-skinned women. I'm sorry, it was an OK documentary, but it was definitely and clearly biased, and not even subtly to me. Just very much so. Not my kind of documentaries. Yeah, yeah, yeah, Beyonce is light skinned and wears her hair straight 90% of the time. OH NO. HOW DARE SHE. Give me a break.
Don't get me wrong, there were some good parts where I definitely was interested and felt they were touching on GOOD points, but it did come off preachy and biased sometimes (like with above).
I agree. I think some people get offended if they belong to that group because they cannot or do not want to recognize/acknowledge their own privilege. It's easier to believe the playing field is level.I just have to add..the very small part where they mention "light skin w/ light eyes & long straight thair" was not a dig against Black women with those features...they were merely pointing out the fact that actresses/models/entertainers w/ those particular features are put on a pedestal in Hollywood and chosen for more roles b/c they are viewed as "prettier" or "more exotic" than the "average" Black woman, whatever that means ...
To me, this did not come across as bashing Beyonce, Rhianna or anyone that looks like them... why is stating the obvious somehow viewed as a diss to them or anyone else? ...
I agree with you on it being obviously biased. I don't necessarily think bias, or having a certain perspective, is a bad thing but it seems like the woman had her own "come to Jesus" moment with her hair and is now very fervent and convinced of her views on relaxers/weaving. The documentary didn't really even seem to be purporting itself as definitive or objective, although some things were said rather matter-of-factly. That's why I really liked the prof's comments because there were well-informed, tempered and acknowledged the need for balance and freedom. And I think the fact that she included people with professional knowledge of the issue, along with "normal folks" showed that she at least was trying to give it more credibility as a documentary than a simple recorded "chat among girlfriends" masquerading as something greater.I thought it was common knowledge oriental is a no-no.
Anyway, the documentary was OK. I liked some parts of it, but it was definitely more geared toward the whole evil relaxer/processed hair idea than it was fair-minded. Also, I noticed the dig about light-skinned women. I'm sorry, it was an OK documentary, but it was definitely and clearly biased, and not even subtly to me. Just very much so. Not my kind of documentaries. Yeah, yeah, yeah, Beyonce is light skinned and wears her hair straight 90% of the time. OH NO. HOW DARE SHE. Give me a break.
Don't get me wrong, there were some good parts where I definitely was interested and felt they were touching on GOOD points, but it did come off preachy and biased sometimes (like with above).
I agree with you on it being obviously biased. I don't necessarily think bias, or having a certain perspective, is a bad thing but it seems like the woman had her own "come to Jesus" moment with her hair and is now very fervent and convinced of her views on relaxers/weaving. The documentary didn't really even seem to be purporting itself as definitive or objective, although some things were said rather matter-of-factly. That's why I really liked the prof's comments because there were well-informed, tempered and acknowledged the need for balance and freedom. And I think the fact that she included people with professional knowledge of the issue, along with "normal folks" showed that she at least was trying to give it more credibility as a documentary than a simple recorded "chat among girlfriends" masquerading as something greater.
On the lightskinned thing, I disagree. There is a difference between recognizing/taking issue with how people perceive and react to light skin/long hair and taking issue with light skin/long hair itself/those who possess it.
"orientals" and canadians don't like it eitherI'm pretty sure the term 'oriental' is only considered offensive in America.
Thanks OP. That haircut is soooo cute on her. It made her eyes and cheeckbones POP