Channy31
New Member
I understand what you're saying with the word "mixed race" and marketing, but type 3 is not "mixed race hair". It's just curly, and therein lies the problem. I don't feel comfortable with a hair curl pattern being called "mixed race" just because it's common among people who are part African and part non-African. It's a bit rude to slap that label on it because implies some sort of ownerships. That's why I don't call 4a/b hair "black" or "African" hair because there are non-Africans who share my hair type. What about all the women who have type 3 hair but do not have a non-black parent? Do they have "mixed race hair" too? Or is it "curly" on everyone who is not mixed race?
That goes right back to my point about social constructs (i.e. mixed race) being marketed as a physical fact (curly hair). What about all the people who are Asian/White, White/Middle-Eastern, multi-Asian (i.e. Indian/Japanese), or Polynesian/White? They are all "mixed race" too, but most of them probably do not have type 3 hair.
Double post
Last edited: