Peachtree
New Member
Ok, it's late.... & instead of going to bed, I'm up thinking about my demarcation line
!
Here's a thought...
Are longer transitions (say 12+ mths) better for the natural hair as opposed to chopping (say within 6 mths)?
I'm thinking that keeping the relaxed hair on the strand as long as possible will protect the ends of the natural hair from being exposed. BUT... if the relaxed hair BREAKS off at the demarcation line, then the natural hair is left with a torn (split) end
I guess both methods have their pros & cons...
Am I making any sense
??
I know that the decision to chop or not is a personal one (that's understood). I'm just curious to know how the hair is affected. Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Here's a thought...
Are longer transitions (say 12+ mths) better for the natural hair as opposed to chopping (say within 6 mths)?
I'm thinking that keeping the relaxed hair on the strand as long as possible will protect the ends of the natural hair from being exposed. BUT... if the relaxed hair BREAKS off at the demarcation line, then the natural hair is left with a torn (split) end
Am I making any sense
I know that the decision to chop or not is a personal one (that's understood). I'm just curious to know how the hair is affected. Anyone have any thoughts on this?