FashionistaNY
New Member
No-Lye Relaxer Products Used in Study (type of neutralizer supplied with product)
A. Dark & Lovely (shampoo neutralizer)
B. Optimum (shampoo neutralizer)
C. Soft & Beautiful (shampoo neutralizer)
D. Precise (shampoo neutralizer)
E. P-Profectiv (neutralizer mousse)
The neutralizer mousse in the Profectiv product has the following formulation:
Part A Water q.s. to 100 Preservative 1.00 Polymer JR30M 0.40 AMAZE 1.00
Part B-Premix Water 1.00 Triethanolamine, 88% 0.56
Part C-Premix Water 1.00 Phenol Red (Indicator) 0.01
Part D-Premix Water 1.00 Citric Acid, anhydrous 0.41
Part E Cocamidopropylbetaine, 30% 6.75 Mackinate EL 2.50
Part F-Premix Polysorbate 20 1.00 Fragrance and natural extracts 0.40
The premix ingredients were mixed together to form a mousse concentrate. The mousse concentrate was charged into a mousse dispenser.
The salon evaluator parted a head of hair into two sections down the middle. The left side of the head was defined and then one of either of the no-lye relaxers denoted A, B, C or D was applied to one side of the half head.
Each other half head had a single no-lye relaxer applied to the head using Profectiv. In the relaxer application and neutralizing process, care was taken to keep products separate on each side of the head. After completion of the relaxing and neutralizing steps, the salon evaluator took care to collect broken hair that had fallen out from each side of head. Broken hair from each side of the head was then placed in a marked container. After broken hair naturally dried inside the marked container, the evaluator counted broken hair from each half head side. The hair count is shown in Table 1.
COMPARISON OF HAIR RELAXED WITH NO LYE RELAXERS AND TREATED WITH SHAMPOO-TYPE NEUTRALIZER AND NEUTRALIZER MOUSSE COMPOSITIONS Number of % Decrease Broken Number of in Number of Hairs:
Broken Hairs Type of relaxer Neutralizer Hairs: with Neutralizer Head per each half of Mousse Shampoo Mousse Number head Composition Neutralizers Composition
1 P/A 39 58 -33%
2 P/B 55 75 -27%
3 P/C 35 47 -26%
4 P/B 60 75 -20%
5 P/A 204 316 -35%
6 P/D 55 70 -21%
7 P/C 40 65 -38%
8 P/B 62 87 -29%
9 P/B 107 130 -18%
10 P/A 67 100 -33%
11 P/D 100 147 -32%
12 P/C 66 79 -16%
13 P/A 125 155 -19%
TOTAL 1015 1404 -28%
From the above data, which are presented in graphic form in FIG. 1, it is apparent that hair relaxed with no-lye relaxer that is neutralized using a neutralizer mousse composition of the present invention exhibits significantly less breakage than hair on the same head that has been relaxed with a no-lye relaxer and neutralized with a shampoo-type neutralizer product. Moreover, the evaluators consistently rated the neutralizer mousse composition treated hair as shinier and softer than hair treated with shampoo-type neutralizers. Further, the evaluators recognized that hair neutralized with the neutralizer mousse compositions of the present invention had increased tensile strength. These results demonstrate that the neutralizer mousse compositions of the present invention provide results that are superior to neutralization with competitive shampoo-type neutralizer compositions.
A. Dark & Lovely (shampoo neutralizer)
B. Optimum (shampoo neutralizer)
C. Soft & Beautiful (shampoo neutralizer)
D. Precise (shampoo neutralizer)
E. P-Profectiv (neutralizer mousse)
The neutralizer mousse in the Profectiv product has the following formulation:
Part A Water q.s. to 100 Preservative 1.00 Polymer JR30M 0.40 AMAZE 1.00
Part B-Premix Water 1.00 Triethanolamine, 88% 0.56
Part C-Premix Water 1.00 Phenol Red (Indicator) 0.01
Part D-Premix Water 1.00 Citric Acid, anhydrous 0.41
Part E Cocamidopropylbetaine, 30% 6.75 Mackinate EL 2.50
Part F-Premix Polysorbate 20 1.00 Fragrance and natural extracts 0.40
The premix ingredients were mixed together to form a mousse concentrate. The mousse concentrate was charged into a mousse dispenser.
The salon evaluator parted a head of hair into two sections down the middle. The left side of the head was defined and then one of either of the no-lye relaxers denoted A, B, C or D was applied to one side of the half head.
Each other half head had a single no-lye relaxer applied to the head using Profectiv. In the relaxer application and neutralizing process, care was taken to keep products separate on each side of the head. After completion of the relaxing and neutralizing steps, the salon evaluator took care to collect broken hair that had fallen out from each side of head. Broken hair from each side of the head was then placed in a marked container. After broken hair naturally dried inside the marked container, the evaluator counted broken hair from each half head side. The hair count is shown in Table 1.
COMPARISON OF HAIR RELAXED WITH NO LYE RELAXERS AND TREATED WITH SHAMPOO-TYPE NEUTRALIZER AND NEUTRALIZER MOUSSE COMPOSITIONS Number of % Decrease Broken Number of in Number of Hairs:
Broken Hairs Type of relaxer Neutralizer Hairs: with Neutralizer Head per each half of Mousse Shampoo Mousse Number head Composition Neutralizers Composition
1 P/A 39 58 -33%
2 P/B 55 75 -27%
3 P/C 35 47 -26%
4 P/B 60 75 -20%
5 P/A 204 316 -35%
6 P/D 55 70 -21%
7 P/C 40 65 -38%
8 P/B 62 87 -29%
9 P/B 107 130 -18%
10 P/A 67 100 -33%
11 P/D 100 147 -32%
12 P/C 66 79 -16%
13 P/A 125 155 -19%
TOTAL 1015 1404 -28%
From the above data, which are presented in graphic form in FIG. 1, it is apparent that hair relaxed with no-lye relaxer that is neutralized using a neutralizer mousse composition of the present invention exhibits significantly less breakage than hair on the same head that has been relaxed with a no-lye relaxer and neutralized with a shampoo-type neutralizer product. Moreover, the evaluators consistently rated the neutralizer mousse composition treated hair as shinier and softer than hair treated with shampoo-type neutralizers. Further, the evaluators recognized that hair neutralized with the neutralizer mousse compositions of the present invention had increased tensile strength. These results demonstrate that the neutralizer mousse compositions of the present invention provide results that are superior to neutralization with competitive shampoo-type neutralizer compositions.