Many of us here have well-defined vertical length goals (ex: BSL, MBL, WL, HL etc). However, how many of you keep track of your horizontal length? This refers to how many of your strands reach the full length you are claiming, and thus, is a measure of how much your hair tapers. Hair that has great horizontal length is thick from root to tip and makes braids that do not taper. For instance:
How is your horizontal length?
What are your horizontal length goals?
What do you think has prevented/promoted your horizontal length?
To answer my post, my horizontal length is a bit off because while my hair is thick from root to tip, the first 10 inches are tex-laxed, while the rest of the 16-18 inches are more strongly processed. The tex-laxed part has more volume, which makes it look thicker than the rest. I hope to grow out the more strongly processed length so that my hair goes back to how it used to be: The same thickness from root to tip. I love the untapered look of thick ends.
How is your horizontal length?
What are your horizontal length goals?
What do you think has prevented/promoted your horizontal length?
To answer my post, my horizontal length is a bit off because while my hair is thick from root to tip, the first 10 inches are tex-laxed, while the rest of the 16-18 inches are more strongly processed. The tex-laxed part has more volume, which makes it look thicker than the rest. I hope to grow out the more strongly processed length so that my hair goes back to how it used to be: The same thickness from root to tip. I love the untapered look of thick ends.
Umm, I hope this doesn't turn out like that ceiling length thread. But I believe BSL, WL,etc are all ways of measuring hair vertically or you can use inches to be more precise. When I think of "horizontal" length, I think of how far you hair spans horizontally across your back (i.e from L shoulder to R shoulder). Or am I misunderstanding you initial post?

