nappity
Member
Well, the OP is going to cut it so the point is moot. BUT @ the bolded, if there is no change to the hair after a month, i.e., the only difference is that it's straight then I'd still say, 'why cut it'?
BTW - I'm not anti trimming or anti cutting. I do think that the automatic "cut it's" are part of a group think that I don't subscribe too.
Your absolutely right. Automatic cutting is not always the way to go. But those conditioners and creams for damaged hair is for hair thats damaged on the surface (cuticle)-. What she described sounds like cortex damage - that doesnt improve with conditioning and better care- as a matter of fact it detracts from the lushness. Every person relaxed or not can see when someones ends are so bad that it detracts. I opt for Healthy Hair. It just looks better without fried ends. For me I just got a sharp scissor and cut off- It was going to happen anyway and having those dried ends (for me) was a walking advertisement for unhealthy hair. Those of us who are proponents of cutting are just encouraging her to embrace what -from her description of her hair -is an inevitability. Even if you cut a little at a time as to not lose a drastic length. It'll eventually have to be removed.
The person who can truly create a product that can bring a dried out splitting porous hair end back to vitality is going to be a billionaire. We spend alot of money averting the root cause.
Oh and all hair is damaged- there is though a point of no return.