E-Fights in Third Person

How to address e-fights on CF

  • Public fights should be allowed in the CF

    Votes: 1 20.0%
  • Continue to allow veiled punches in the third person

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Take it to the alley OFF the CF, for G-d's sake!

    Votes: 3 60.0%
  • HUH???? AHHH, I know what you mean now. Blech!

    Votes: 1 20.0%

  • Total voters
    5
  • Poll closed .

JaneBond007

New Member
There's a poll attached. Should it be knock-out in public view with parties named? Veiled mention as we see today, ad nauseum, or addressed in total private? Honestly!:rolleyes: I should have added an option of "Rebuke it in Jesus' name!" :nono::nono::nono: I'm tired of all this craziness. Surely, there have been fights and I've been involved in a few over the years. But THIS!!! Stop it right now. We are NOT INTERESTED in your beef. Address that person in private, please! I come on here for edification, not to read all these hidden insults and whatnot. It's meshugena!
 
Last edited:
Wow. I'm lost.And I hesitate to ask what happened.

As women of God we should know better. Do what the Bible says and go to your sister alone and discuss it with her.

We have to do better!
 
Well, I just ignored all those scriptural rebukes because they were in their own thread. I knew what was up. Now they've spread to the RT. Snark rebuking snark. I've tried to hold back and even suggest in a rather roundabout way. Next time, I'm just going to directly address the person in public. I'm not against disagreements at all, I'm against this particular type of display because it's very accusative and about supposedly serious things - charges of hellfire and illegal behavior. I'm not privy to all the info in the beef so why are my eyes bombarded with these charges to attempt to get people against said victim of it? Who am I, the CF police? Nope. I just find this particular case ridiculous and extremely harmful and that the person can see it for how it affects others negatively, particularly their poor victim. :nono: Mistaken identity? Take it off CF and know that folks can see through all those posts of "wisdom." :rolleyes: Every one of them is an attack against a fellow believer. :nono:
 
Last edited:
Because there was a horrible misunderstanding with someone who mistook it was about them, and I do mean, HORRIBLE, I'm sending this last post on this issue. Yeah, I was mortified they thought such. There's only so much I can do to correct it, after that, they take it up with G-d. I'm out of it. Anyhoo, things look calmer now and I hope they remain so. But I wanted to clear up something. You cannot legally go about threatening litigation or such against people as a means to silence them, especially if you have the wrong persons you're attacking and accusing them of cyberstalking you. Mentioning that those who harass you are on this board but indirectly so? Leaving folks to believe they are on THIS forum?

I've read that blog and I believe the person is being harassed. However, who, what and how being blasted over in the CF some months ago and this continuous blogging on the subject where that sentence of "they are on the forum," charging with threats of litigation and outing such as "I am a lawyer" and making it seem they are actually here is inappropriate for this christian forum. So are these jabs being made from time to time concerning people who hide their evil ways etc. I don't see the point of blogging that folks are harassing you illegally and then you don't directly say but make it seem that they are right here amongst us in our forum and indirectly threatening them with litigation and surveillance. None of us here are privy to your life nor that situation. It should never blow up on here again. There was even an exchange such that you stated you weren't receiving their communication? I mean, this is meshugena and I've held this in for a long time, responding to something awful I've witnessed. Jabs continue. We see it. The blog continues, we see the jabs related to it. If people are experiencing cyber stalking, here's some information they should take to start stopping it:

http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/telecom/cyberstalking-and-cyberharassment-laws.aspx

Other than that, it looks like pure paranoia. The sole reason I'm addressing it is that it looks ILLEGAL to even put such exchanges and charges on this net. This is beyond "I think you don't like me." Way beyond and crosses over into illegalities. Sorry. If you are a lawyer and are manipulating around being fully responsible for harassment, then you are misusing your profession and stampeding your oath of justice.

The mods can lock or destroy this thread now.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top