Actually, yes that is exactly what is being implied if not said outright. And I am speaking very specifically on the claim that we should "embrace our hair as it grows out of our heads", since the phrase is tossed around in every nappy discussion.
I am sure that there is no questioning that hair does not grow in twist, braid or puff formation. The default natural hair style is an afro whether it is a TWA, BAF or somewhere in between. So if a fro is the universal starting point and common denominator with nappy hair, then it's a fair place to determine whether it is a universally flattering style. Which I don't believe it is. It's hard to live up to universal standards, whether they be pre-determined by Europeans or Africans.
OMg! i was just coming in to mention this. I'm always hearing accept it the way it grows out of your head, stop trying to make your hair do stuff it doesn't. Our hair does not grow out in twists, twistouts or braids or puffs!!
free form locks, on the other hand (the kind rastafarians grow) would just require that i wash and leave it alone and never comb it.
about that. I'm not saying that we shouldn't celebrate natural hair . . . indeed, we should. It's quite revolutionary that it's becoming more mainstream after years of being viewed a choice that is "radical" or "political." It's just hair, people. So, given that I recognize that, why must we do a seeming 180 degree flip to excluding relaxed locks from the discussion of African American haircare? No, it's not me "wanting to be white" or denying my heritage. Again, it's just. hair. Sheesh.
Isn't dye a chemical?