A Woman's natural use?

[LatterGlory]

For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
(Rom 1:26-27)

 

[Sharpened]

If a man wants your anus don't you think it's just a hop skip and jump to homosexuality?

No, but there is a hidden-in-plain-sight agenda to encourage this among straight and gay alike. Even non-Christians are catching onto it.

 

[Guitarhero]

I personally think that scripture is talking about homosexuality and lesbianism, not anal sex per se.

 

[LatterGlory]

_________________

 

[LatterGlory]

Strong's Concordance

Natural:

G5446
φυσικός
phusikos
foo-see-kos'
From G5449; “physical”, that is, (by implication) instinctive: - natural. Compare G5591.

Use:

G5540
χρῆσις
chrēsis
khray'-sis
From G5530; employment, that is, (specifically) sexual intercourse (as an occupation of the body): - use.

 

[aribell]

The "natural use," referring to our God created and God ordained sexuality and sexual parts. Leaving the natural use would be turning away from women and men's sexual parts being designed for one another and instead turning toward one's own gender.

 

[MSee]

The "natural use," referring to our God created and God ordained sexuality and sexual parts. Leaving the natural use would be turning away from women and men's sexual parts being designed for one another and instead turning toward one's own gender.

^^^I agree.
Anatomy was my favorite subject while studying. The design of the male and females sexual parts were obviously perfectly complementary. The anus was not in that category.

 

[LatterGlory]

____________
_____________

 

[BeautifulFlower]

I dont think it is close to homosexuality at all. Engaging in that act with your wife does not translate to a man thinking, "This would feel equally as good with a man"...Likewise, a woman wont receive oral from her husband and want to experience it with a woman. If their is curiosity for same sex, it has nothing to do with the act you are performing more than an (ungodly) attraction to the same sex.


The marriage bed is undefiled and what a man and his wife choose to do or not do should not be judged or condemned. As long as do not welcome anyone else (by person or video) into their bedroom, they should be free to do whatever they are comfortable with...anal or not (unless the bible plainly speaks against it).

 

[dicapr]

^^^I agree.
Anatomy was my favorite subject while studying. The design of the male and females sexual parts were obviously perfectly complementary. The anus was not in that category.

You are right. The anus was not designed for that. There is even a medical condition that is prominate in the gay community because of that act-it can damage your intestinal track.

 

[Crown]

It seems to becoming an interesting way to do it, even in the Christianity. Maybe this person does not realize it or will never effectively jump into homosexuality, but in fact it is an homosexual way.

It is acting like two persons who can’t do it in the natural use/way because they are two men.

About undefiled, I think it is more precise in the French versions or the NIV :
Heb. 13 4Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral. (NIV)

The Bible says :
Ps. 139.14 I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made…

If you observe the human body, there is a place for each thing.
One place to eat.
One place to breath
.....…

If the human body can’t do something as it was intended for, it is because there is a problem.

Why not do it the natural way?
The way to do it if a baby is wanted.

 

[Poohbear]

Vicky7,

How do you feel about oral sex among married Christian couples??? It involves the mouth which its natural use is intended for eating, drinking, and talking...

 

[MSee]

It seems to becoming an interesting way to do it, even in the Christianity. Maybe this person does not realize it or will never effectively jump into homosexuality, but in fact it is an homosexual way.

It is acting like two persons who can’t do it in the natural use/way because they are two men.

About undefiled, I think it is more precise in the French versions or the NIV :
Heb. 13 4Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral. (NIV)

The Bible says :
Ps. 139.14 I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made…

If you observe the human body, there is a place for each thing.
One place to eat.
One place to breath
.....…

If the human body can’t do something as it was intended for, it is because there is a problem.

Why not do it the natural way?
The way to do it if a baby is wanted.

I call it the "has God said" approach the serpant used in the garden. Anal sex between man and woman is not discussed outright in the bible at least I haven't seen it except for the very verses used in the opening post (natural use means natural use), so it can be "debated" and expertly so even among Christians. Added to that many people have been introduced to it via ponography when they are already in a heightened state of arousal and it soon looks like norm to them and as studies show they most likely would attempt what they saw in a 'fantasy' situation when in the real act of intercourse. In my opinion the request may not signify that the man is a homosexual but I think it's an open door for the Devil to introduce the concept as also being 'not so bad'. Personally I'd rather not give place to the Devil, as the writer of Ephesians warns.

Even nature shows us a thing or two otherwise. I read a study few weeks ago regarding deviant sexual behaviour in animals. The incidence was such a rarity that they further studied the animals that may have shown some signs and they found in most cases it may have been a fluke. The animals knew what body part is for what.

I also had a friend who was damaged terrible because of it, but know of others who claim to enjoy it.

 

[LatterGlory]

All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any.
(1Co 6:12) (KJV)

OR

12"Everything is permissible for me"—but not everything is beneficial. "Everything is permissible for me"—but I will not be mastered by anything. (NIV)

 

[LatterGlory]

I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
(Rom 7:25)


This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.
(Gal 5:16)