LittleMissScientist
New Member
Thanks for bumping- I was just thinking about this since it's been a little over a year since I got my first texturizer!
I think that I've come to the conclusion that a texturizer is beneficial to the extent that a) you want to do a wash-and-go style all or 90% of the time; b) you want the hair to dry without 100% shrinkage; and c) you want to spend little to no time styling your hair EVER.
I've spent considerably less time styling my hair in the past year- I would say the time to style is reduced by about 80%. This is because I wash-and-go all the time and deep condition maybe once a month if I remember. However, certain styles, like twists and twistouts that were staples when I was natural just don't look the same as the volume of the hair has decreased. In this way, texturized hair, IMO, does not have the same versatility as natural hair. BUT, the wash-and-go can be shaped into different styles (poofy, wavy bun; smooth bun; messy pin-up, etc) or just worn as is with no fuss.
When the colder months hit and it's not feasible to walk outside with a wet head full of conditioner, I think I'm going to maintain a straight style, although honestly it's not really that much easier for me to get my hair straight and keep it that way. Rollersets still take forever to dry and the hair puffs easily.
Having said all this, I don't think I would texturize if I could do it all over again. I've only decided to maintain this process because I love being able to just conditioner wash every morning and that's it. I know that my hair will dry without puffing out incredibly. Also, I think I have retained a lot of length by not manipulating the hair much at all. However, I find myself caressing the little curls and waves at the root that are actually shinier and stronger than my texturized hair! Sometimes I miss the massiveness of my natural hair, but then I remember the struggles to comb it that usually resulted in me losing a lot of hair (despite following the correct techniques for detangling- I just shed easily
). That's not the case with the texturizer, so I'm going to grow this way as long as I can!
I think that I've come to the conclusion that a texturizer is beneficial to the extent that a) you want to do a wash-and-go style all or 90% of the time; b) you want the hair to dry without 100% shrinkage; and c) you want to spend little to no time styling your hair EVER.
I've spent considerably less time styling my hair in the past year- I would say the time to style is reduced by about 80%. This is because I wash-and-go all the time and deep condition maybe once a month if I remember. However, certain styles, like twists and twistouts that were staples when I was natural just don't look the same as the volume of the hair has decreased. In this way, texturized hair, IMO, does not have the same versatility as natural hair. BUT, the wash-and-go can be shaped into different styles (poofy, wavy bun; smooth bun; messy pin-up, etc) or just worn as is with no fuss.
When the colder months hit and it's not feasible to walk outside with a wet head full of conditioner, I think I'm going to maintain a straight style, although honestly it's not really that much easier for me to get my hair straight and keep it that way. Rollersets still take forever to dry and the hair puffs easily.
Having said all this, I don't think I would texturize if I could do it all over again. I've only decided to maintain this process because I love being able to just conditioner wash every morning and that's it. I know that my hair will dry without puffing out incredibly. Also, I think I have retained a lot of length by not manipulating the hair much at all. However, I find myself caressing the little curls and waves at the root that are actually shinier and stronger than my texturized hair! Sometimes I miss the massiveness of my natural hair, but then I remember the struggles to comb it that usually resulted in me losing a lot of hair (despite following the correct techniques for detangling- I just shed easily
