Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What a mean-spirited, arrogant thread. Please ladies do not say/think now this is what naturals do, this is how they think. Please remember this is a thread started by the OP and the OP alone.
I agree. It's definitely money in black hair care. Even if we all went natural, it would still be a $4 billion dollar business because then they would just make more products geared towards natural hair care just like they are beginning to do now. They would jack up the prices, and guess what, we would buy them. It's a no win situation when it comes to our hair.
All I have to say is the OP bet not nevah, not nevah relax cause you know this thread will get bumped.![]()
"Good and healthy", I can relate to what they are saying here and can agree. Personally, I think relaxers are the best thing that could have ever happen for black hair. Don't hang me, just hear me out. The problem arose because we were not given proper instructions on how to care for them in order to keep our hair healthy.I'm sure in the beginning, the companies that were making them probably didn't know what they were doing and was using us as guinnea pigs as well. It was designed to allow us ease in handling our hair. Now, fast forward 30 years and we're all alot smarter when it comes to our hair, including the companies producing the products. We now have flat irons, round brushes, blowdryers, etc. I can think back to when I was little girl and wash day came along. All we had was white rose and crown something to put on our hair.
Natural hair in the dirty south with 100 degrees of smothering heat is no joke to have to get your hair pressed. Hang!
that was child abuse right there! Burnt ears, foreheads and edges! With that said, I can't kick dirt on the relaxers. That just took me back.
Co-signingerplexed
I will quote the LHCFer when I find it...
she actually said relaxers were good for her hair...
give me a minute... or day... I'll get it.
Anyway, I think I made my point... or actually ya'll made it for me
((PUSHING MY AGENDA))
It's not good for you so why do it...
We shouldn't put it in or on our body if it's doesn't add anything
to our health. Have you read Dr. Oz's book? or Kevin Truedeau.
it's like SUGAR... sugar is bad for you but nobody wants
to stop using it because it's SOO GOOD right...
Sugar is more addictive than cocaine as demonstrated
by research... someone posted it in another thread...
same thing with relaxers... they are NOT GOOD FOR YOU.
I mean how long did it take for people to get that cigarettes were bad
that High Fructose was bad, that mineral oil was bad for hair
It's like you won't know it's bad for you until something really bad happens...
until you get smacked in the face with it...
until you read the research article about African- American hair stylists having
higher rates of cancer than any other race in that profession...
That's my point.
I'm not perfect though... just want you to see it... I'm not judging... I'm one applicator brush away from a touch up myself. Not really but you know what I mean. I'm not like anti-relaxer... well maybe a little... at the very least I think women should stretch at least 12 weeks. I'm not judging... I'm not Bishop SouthernTease... do what you want but if I at least made you think twice about it... I feel I've done my part. ((DUCES))
I don't think relaxers are good for your hair but I also don't think they have to be bad for your hair either. (I used to think it was hair rape, until i learned better). The health of your hair depends on how you take care of it, you can have unhealthy natural hair the same way you can have unhealthy relaxed hair.
Not good, if they were I wouldn't need to counteract the moisture loss with moisturizing conditions and then counteract the structural damage with protein conditioners. I would consider them a tolerable evil. I'm willing to tolerate the damage they do because of the style versatility it provides.
The bolded - that's LMAO loud funny right thereGod, isn't that true. If i had a nickel for every woman who went natural with the intentions of looking like Jill Scott and Erykah Badu (not to mention every man who thought is natural-headed wife was going to look like Alicia Keys and Gelila Bekele) I would be so damn rich. Outside of this site and little children, most women I know who returned to natural hair after being relaxed for many years are in worse shape than when they were natural. They look like a rusted-dusted Big Chop 7 years post. Then they make the excuse that black women's hair isn't meant to be long and Erykah wears a wig while Jill Scott is mixed.erplexed
Knowledge is key to growth. The more you know, the more you grow. Honestly, sometimes I'm surprised as to how so many women on this site have natural hair so long because I don't find many sites promoting LONG natural hair as much as they promote their "natural hair is better" agenda. It's as if they don't believe their own hype.
One day I will go natural, but I want the right amount of support. I'm not finding that too much lately. And heck! Being natural cannot be so great if everyone of my natural relatives texlaxed and we've had a surge of naturals switch it up to chemically-treating their hair.
Southerntease: I don't hate you or anything, but I'm going to have to go with Hopeful. Yo make valid points but their redundant and easily argued. It's best you leave this one alone. But, I understand where you're coming from. When I first transitioned, I was a bit cult-like with my the foolish-juice too.
Never thought I would say this, considering the motto of my site and all: But, it's just hair.look:
All I have to say is the OP bet not nevah, not nevah relax cause you know this thread will get bumped.![]()
Even natural dry hair needs lots and lots of moisture because the coils in the natural hair strand make it difficult for our scalps natural oils to travel up to the ends. Now my thought is this, seeing that I'd have to moisturize my dry natural hair then it's okay to do so to my relaxed hair as well.
If it's the same work to be done to either, then it's not a problem for me and to be quite honest if my hair was natural and did not require any type of extra work, then I wouldn't even bother to relax. But because they both require a lot of moisturizing effort, then I'm not losing anything, in fact, it's easier for me to comb and moisturize my 4a/b relaxed hair.
I have a relaxer. I don't think relaxers are "good" for your hair. They can for some, make the hair more manageable. However, I think if they are applied properly and your hair is well taken care of, you're hair can thrive with them.
The key is to apply them properly and don't abuse them. Don't apply them all the way to the ends and don't relax every 4 weeks and expect your hair to flourish.
I wouldn't say healthy but neither is that slice of cheesecake I ate for lunch. I haven't had any problems and my hair's health hasn't been affected so no worries here.![]()
Remember the OP was wearing her hair relaxed about a year or so ago so she ain't have all that much of a testimony. Now I can understand if she was never ever relaxed before or never used any type of chemicals in her hair to even have a voice to speak as loud as she does. Some of us tend to forget where we come from. For example as for me, I never thought I'd ever use ayurveda hair products (not being Indian an' all) but I'm big enough to admit that now that I have tried them - I really really love them - that's my testimony
!
Also Off TopicOff Topic:
Your hair looks great
That is the gospel troof!!!Natural hair doesn't require a whole lot of extra work unless you want to wear straight. I get your point, though. The bottom line is, our hair requires work whether it's relaxed or natural, it's just a different type of work in most cases.
Natural hair doesn't require a whole lot of extra work unless you want to wear straight. I get your point, though. The bottom line is, our hair requires work whether it's relaxed or natural, it's just a different type of work in most cases.
Your hair seem to be a 3c texture, nothing like my 4 a/b texture and I do not agree that it does not require a whole lot of moisturizing as I did wear my hair natural for a while and it was downright difficult for me to keep moisturized and soft and that is why I feel so strongly about this. When i was natural, I lost a lot of hair in the comb. Now had my hair been a 3c texture, I don't think that I would be bothering to relax it, at least not as often as I do now.
I thank God for the man/woman who invented the relaxer, whether good or bad, it's been extremely intrumental in making my combing efforts a whole lot easier....I hated detangling my natural hair but I utterly enjoy caring for my relaxed hair.
And yes, we do have this one thought in common and that is that both textures requires work, whether it's a little work or a lot of it, it's still work.
My niece is 4b/c like my Sister and I....We are relaxed but we are not going to relax her hair any time soon...She is almost 14.....The tighter your coils..... the harder it is for your hair to hold moisture...Scientific fact....It is very challenging to keep her hair moisturized and soft....Way more work than my relaxed 4b hair......My Sister just said yesterday if she didn't have me taking care of her hair she would have to relax it........My Sister other daughter is 12 and she has 3b hair and it is so much easier to keep hair moisturized and soft.....To style...and it has way more versatility ........