• ⏰ Welcome, Guest! You are viewing only 2 out of 27 total forums. Register today to view more, then Subscribe to view all forums, submit posts, reply to posts, create new threads, view photos, access private messages, change your avatar, create a photo album, customize your profile, and possibly be selected as our next Feature of the Month.

Redken Anti-Snap vs. Sally's GVP Version

⏳ Limited Access:

Register today to view all forum posts.

baglady215

Well-Known Member
I have a question for the ladies who have tried both. Is the Sally's brand comparable? I bought a little sample size of the Redken and I :love3: it with all my heart. But if I can save $10 a bottle, Redken can kick rocks.

Even if you haven't tried the real deal, please let me know your thoughts on the Sally's version. Thank ya!
 
I've never used Redken, but Sally's version is considered a twin to it (by some). I think my hair didn't like it because of the wheat protein. Luckily, you can return used products to Sally's so you won't lose $$. HHJ!
 
How are you all using this? I have the GVP but can't figure out the best use for this.

Sent from my DROIDX using Long Hair Care Forum App
 
I use it as a leave in. It's supposed to be strengthening but it leaves my hair really soft with great slip.
 
dang :ohwell: ihonestly ment to try Sallys version a loooong time ago.

ifell in LOVE with Redken antisnap :grin: iused it alot last year when iwas co-washing daily.

but ihavent repurchased since trying to keep my hair straight during the winter :look: it made it revert =/
 
I use it as a leave in. It's supposed to be strengthening but it leaves my hair really soft with great slip.
I used it as a L-I but didn't feel its benefits. Will try again soon.
Sent from my DROIDX using Long Hair Care Forum App
 
Back
Top