virtuenow
Well-Known Member
I think people have to realize that hair wears and tears down like anything else in life. And even with all the care in the world, the oldest parts of your hair are bound to experience some splitting/wear, and usually, since all the strands' ends are around the same things and sort of endure the same elements, they most likely wear and tear in a pattern that is more or less common to all. The reason I think search and destroy is such a futile task is:Let's consider the second point above. My hair after 4 months of nottrimming wasn't thin because it had split ends. If you think about it, split ends would probably just look frizzy but not thin. The thinness comes AFTER part of the split ends have actually torn away. The thin ends IMO are a sign that my hair ends not only burst open due to the cuticle tearing off and exposing the cortex but that it too is wearing away without the cuticle to protect it:
- There's no way one can possibly examine the 110,000 strands of hair on the head to make sure they don't miss one;
- Unless you're tracing your hair strands from root to ends, there's no way to tell if the "unsplit" end is truly an intact strand or one that's already split and torn away leaving a single thin end.
![]()
So what I would see with S&D would be half a hair that seems fine coz it's not two ends, but I suspect a microscope would tell me a whole different story and explain the thin ends. It just makes no sense to me that my hair strands can be living together on this head of mine all going through the same procedures and only a few get to split.So rather than play a game of guessing which ones are whole and which ones are not, or playing a game of inny mini miny moe where some get dusted and some get missed coz my naked eye just isn't equipped to scan each strand, I treat them all the same because prevention, IMO, is better than cure .
Actually it is possible to examine all of your hair: anyone interested in the search and destroy method should see these youtube tutorials:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3C0ndGIZpg&feature=related
I find this option to be more effective than just cutting a certain amounnt, like 1/4 in or 1/2 in, for instance. Sometimes the split or bulb is higher, sometimes lower, and if you have a good preventative program, no splits at all. I'm not knocking your technique, but some people seem to be trimming their hair at the same rate the hair grows (or pretty close). Hence, the continuing pattern of hair that appears to "not grow". I'm just saying that there are ways to prevent the splits in the first place, despite the fact that hair wears-n-tears.