summerof1990
Well-Known Member
would u say these are split for a no conditioner oils or nothing? just a shampoo and dry.?
yes no maybe soo?


yes no maybe soo?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can only see one or two actual splits but overall the ends don't look in good shape.
I would say her ends are split. Your ends are split. Everyone's ends are split except that one person that just trimmed this very second.
Good point! But even after a trim, there are hair strands that are still split.![]()
Thin, but not split
Its not splits but it is clearly breakage.
I would say her ends are split. Your ends are split. Everyone's ends are split except that one person that just trimmed this very second.
You cannot see split ends.A split end doesn't just go from not there to being there. It starts at this size . and then goes to this size . and then this size....and so on until it's this size - and then this size _ and then you might just start to see it when it's this size __.
Folks talk about holding their hair to the light to see split ends. Well, just so you know, when your splits are this size . they look this bad:
![]()
And you know you're lying if you say holding a section this size . to the light will show you the split.Folks act like a split is only a split when it's ___ this big. Plus most people with fine hair loose bits of their hair by the time the split is this big _ so that you already have a thin end.
So people need to stop acting like they have magic hair that doesn't wear and tear. It does. Just coz you can't see it w/o using a microscope doesn't mean it's not split. The only thing you can do is keep splits at a small scale so you don't even notice their effect on your hair. Waiting to see them, means you've had splits for months.
So yes, that pic has splits. Unless I'm looking at steel wool, then it's split. It's the way nature works. Organic things wear with time. The end.
Unfortunately, all of the hair looks dry and damaged to me. I can't just comment on the ends alone. ETA: These pics look familiar, or maybe I'm used to seeing tons of hair pics.
Tiye, Looks can be deceiving. Just because that's all you see, doesn't mean that's all there is. A hair that has already lost part of its mass (branches torn off) will not look split coz the split is gone. Also if the splits are this small - and look like the three bottom strands below,
![]()
you would not to able to see the ruggedness that shows ripped off cuticles and part of the cortex.