Tracy
New Member
Curve Salon...Relaxed Heads Can\'t \"Silken\"?
I had a conversation today with TiTi from Curve salon. She was nice enough, and seemed to be quite willing to spend however long discussing options with me (which was nice of her...) but I got the distinct impression that they have a problem servicing relaxed hair.
See - my Mom is natural and she wants a silkener (she thinks. I keep telling her no but the B/A's have her going...). With the amount of curl that people seemed to have retained doing the method they offer there, the silkener, I thought *I* might also want to transition out of what I've always considered to be a texturizer into what I now consider to be much closer to a texturizer now that I've seen pics (I hope I'm still making sense here).....
But she said they don't "silken" relaxed hair....Why's that? says I...figuring perhaps they were using the chemical that Rusk Anti Curl uses...maybe it wasn't compatible with Sodium Hydroxide (lye) based relaxers and that was why....I made it clear that I wanted to transition from the relaxer to the silkener and gradually cut the ends off. She confirmed that the chemical they use IS Sodium Hydroxide, but it's "different" and they won't do it, even to the new growth of relaxed hair....
So I'm a little lost - but now I'm obsessed with the idea of having hair that is texturized "better" so that I retain more curl....
So here's my question...do you guys think this is a marketing ploy? I mean her explanation just didn't make sense to me given what I know about chemicals and hair thus far (which is more than a little) and I understand the technique is different, but I'm not sure I understand why they can't just do the technique on my new growth - unless they just refuse to do relaxed hair.
She already suggested (horrors) that I CUT OFF MY HAIR to a TWA and then get the silkener....
Now I have no problems with TWA's (they are lovely!) but I just spent 3 years growing my hair out and if it's the same chemical that I'm gonna put RIGHT back in my hair, "technique" notwithstanding...then aren't I cutting off perfectly good hair that I could KEEP while I move slowly and gradually into the silkener, but for, what is sounding to me suspiciously like relaxer discrimination?????
Am I missing something?
The bottom line is it sounds like her options for me are 1. not to give me the service (for no good reason that can see) or 2. cut off all my hair so she can give me the service...
Not good options! My problem is the motivation seems fishy and I wonder about it.....wanted some feedback....
I had a conversation today with TiTi from Curve salon. She was nice enough, and seemed to be quite willing to spend however long discussing options with me (which was nice of her...) but I got the distinct impression that they have a problem servicing relaxed hair.
See - my Mom is natural and she wants a silkener (she thinks. I keep telling her no but the B/A's have her going...). With the amount of curl that people seemed to have retained doing the method they offer there, the silkener, I thought *I* might also want to transition out of what I've always considered to be a texturizer into what I now consider to be much closer to a texturizer now that I've seen pics (I hope I'm still making sense here).....
But she said they don't "silken" relaxed hair....Why's that? says I...figuring perhaps they were using the chemical that Rusk Anti Curl uses...maybe it wasn't compatible with Sodium Hydroxide (lye) based relaxers and that was why....I made it clear that I wanted to transition from the relaxer to the silkener and gradually cut the ends off. She confirmed that the chemical they use IS Sodium Hydroxide, but it's "different" and they won't do it, even to the new growth of relaxed hair....

So I'm a little lost - but now I'm obsessed with the idea of having hair that is texturized "better" so that I retain more curl....
So here's my question...do you guys think this is a marketing ploy? I mean her explanation just didn't make sense to me given what I know about chemicals and hair thus far (which is more than a little) and I understand the technique is different, but I'm not sure I understand why they can't just do the technique on my new growth - unless they just refuse to do relaxed hair.

She already suggested (horrors) that I CUT OFF MY HAIR to a TWA and then get the silkener....
Now I have no problems with TWA's (they are lovely!) but I just spent 3 years growing my hair out and if it's the same chemical that I'm gonna put RIGHT back in my hair, "technique" notwithstanding...then aren't I cutting off perfectly good hair that I could KEEP while I move slowly and gradually into the silkener, but for, what is sounding to me suspiciously like relaxer discrimination?????
Am I missing something?
The bottom line is it sounds like her options for me are 1. not to give me the service (for no good reason that can see) or 2. cut off all my hair so she can give me the service...
Not good options! My problem is the motivation seems fishy and I wonder about it.....wanted some feedback....