• ⏰ Welcome, Guest! You are viewing only 2 out of 27 total forums. Register today to view more, then Subscribe to view all forums, submit posts, reply to posts, create new threads, view photos, access private messages, change your avatar, create a photo album, customize your profile, and possibly be selected as our next Feature of the Month.

Bunning vs C&G, which one promotes fastest growth and is healthiest?

⏳ Limited Access:

Register today to view all forum posts.

Prettyeyes

Well-Known Member
I have used both techniques and received growth but honestly I am thinking that bunning may be best. When I bun I am VERY strict and when I did the C&G I was strict also but it seems bunning is better for the ends. Anyone else?
 
I like both, C&G seems like more drastic retention probably cause I don't see my length all the time, but I was surprised at my retention with (phony ponies) this summer, I do like buns better cause I can get treat my hair the same easier...
 
For me, bunning hurt my edges.:ohwell: My hair is just not long enough to do that without feeling super stretched!:lachen: However, my modified C&G technique using flat twists makes my hair retain length without feeling forced to fit in a certain style.
 
Okay what exactly is this bunning technique? I hear about it all the time but I never really cared to much about it, but now I am interested to know. Is it just putting your hair into a bun? What is a basic regimen for this technique?
 
I think bunning promotes better retention and hair growth. I used bunning for 6 months and was able to get from scraping SL to BSL.
 
I think C&G is better simply because you dont mess with it. No combing so no possibility of pulling or tugging on the hair. No combing, no nothing for about 8 weeks thus more retention (granted when you take the braids out you are gentle).

C&G gives you and your hair a break.
 
I like both of them but I think the C&G method is much better. You are not messing with your hair. I plan to do the C&G sometime in Dec.
 
Bunning is the method I used to grow my hair and in my first 2 years it helped me retain nearly all of my growth.
 
Neither of them promote growth. They both aids for *retention* because both are protective styles and C&G especially is a low manipulation style.

C&G worked well for me. Definitely helped me with maximum retention. I've never done bunning for long periods so I couldn't do a fair comparison. But instinctively I feel that C&G would be more effective because it is very low manipilation. With bunning you still have to do some regular styling of your hair - detangling, smoothing - to get the style smooth and to prevent your hair from dreading. However then I see people like babygurl and Traycee who have retained a lot from bunning, and I figure it works very well for some people.

Personally, my ends seem to get very dry, crispy and bended when I bun (I've seen other people, e.g. even Cathy Howse, say the same happens to them). But right now, I just can't be bothered to take the time to get braid extensions put in or to do them myself, so I'll try to see if I can make bunning work for me.
 
I'm doing the C&G method now. perhaps when my hair grows out longer I'll do wet bunning (hopefully by june 2009:grin:). I love braids though, and I've decided no micros for me-too much stress on my edges.
 
Back
Top